Since we are now well into MLB spring training, we thought we’d share an excellent article written a few years ago by Steve Gilbert at MLB.com about a typical life of an MLB umpire. We all know it’s far from an easy gig, and can cause quite a bit of unnecessary stress. Steve’s article from a few years ago tells the story of what it’s like umping in the big show, from MLB ump Jeff Kellogg’s point of view. We hope you enjoy the read!
As we head into spring training, the game of baseball at the professional level will be undergoing a seismic change compared to years past. Yielding to the complaints of players and fans alike about the typical game lasting WAY too long, new rules will be implemented to speed up the pace of the game. The new rules about batters staying in the box and pitchers being ready to pitch immediately after the commercial break ends have just been announced. And many of us have let out a collective “it’s about time!”.
For years many folks have been clamoring for rules to eliminate unnecessary time-wasting tactics such as batters stepping out of the box after every pitch. Pitchers certainly have been known to waste time on the mound, but they can’t get set and look in for a sign until the batter is ready. Forcing the batter to stay in the box will force him to get ready more quickly which will in turn speed the pitchers up as well.
Specifically, the pace of game program will require that all batters must keep at least one foot in the batter’s box unless one of a group of exceptions occurs. This amendment/re-emphasis of existing Rule 6.02(d) allows batters to leave the box if the following events occur:
- The batter swings at a pitch;
- The batter is forced out of the batter’s box by a pitch;
- A member of either team requests and is granted “Time”;
- A defensive player attempts a play on a runner at any base;
- The batter feints a bunt;
- A wild pitch or passed ball occurs;
- The pitcher leaves the dirt area of the pitching mound after receiving the ball; or
- The catcher leaves the catcher’s box to give defensive signals.
To summarize the above points, called balls and called strikes are the only occurrences after which the batter must stay in the box.
In addition to the batters box rule, there will now be a stricter timing of between-innings breaks and pitching change breaks during the game. Specifically, timers will be added that will measure the time during these breaks. One timer will be installed on or near the outfield scoreboard, and a smaller timer will be installed on the facade behind home plate near the press box. Immediately following the third out of each half-inning, the timer will count down from 2:25 for locally televised games and from 2:45 for nationally televised games. An MLB representative attending each game will operate the timers from each ballpark.
As for the rules about pitchers warming up more quickly, the addition of a clock for those purposes and the requirement that everyone be ready to go after the commercial break is over may be initially disruptive. But given that it’s about preparation and not actual game play, they’ll most likely adjust to it fairly quickly and it’ll just become a new normal.
All of that said, having a limited number of situations in which a batter must stay in the box will encourage a lot more staying-in-the-box than we expect. Of course, sometimes they’re trying to mess with a pitcher’s rhythm, but not too often, and it’s obvious when they’re doing it. If we start to change their habits on called balls and strikes, batters will most likely start staying in the box more because that’s the new rhythm.
So we will soon start to hear about some batters complaining about not being able to step out, and some pitchers will claim about being rushed in their warm-up routines. But overall these are pretty minor changes to players’ routines that could realistically speed up the pace of the game to everyone’s liking.
News of late from Major League Baseball is that there has been discussion about altering the definition of the strike zone for the first time in almost twenty years. The reason, those- in-the-know state, is that the predominantly low strike zone has been the culprit of low-scoring games the League has seen over the past few season. So will umpires start to readjust their zones in order to appease League officials?
Concern around baseball about the strike zone filtered down to the MLB’s Playing Rules Committee, which must formally adopt a rules change before it’s implemented. The committee will pay close attention to the size of the strike zone in 2015 with an eye on change as early as 2016 after studies showed it has expanded significantly since 2009, coinciding with a serious drop in run scoring. It is well known that the low strike is considered a significantly more difficult pitch to hit.
Runs per game fell to 4.07 in 2014, the lowest mark since 1981 and the 13th fewest since World War II. This alarming stat has the Rules Committee taking a serious look at the situation.
Research has shown that since 2009, the average size of the called strike zone has jumped from 435 square inches to 475 square inches. The results: Pitchers are throwing more in the lower part of the zone, and hitters are swinging at an increased rate, knowing the tough-to-drive pitches will be called strikes.
The problem, sources said, stems from technological leaps that caused unintended consequences. In 1996, when the league last changed the strike zone to extend it from the top of the knees to the bottom, beneath the hollow of the kneecap, it did so to encourage umpires to call knee-level strikes. The lower end of the zone, in practice, was about three-quarters of the way down the thigh, so the idea was that by adjusting the eye levels of umpires to look lower, the result would be a more traditional strike zone.
Then along came Questec, the computerized pitch-tracking system, followed by Zone Evaluation, the current version tied in to MLB’s PITCHf/x system. With a tremendous degree of accuracy – especially in recent years – the systems tracked textbook balls and strikes, and the home-plate umpires’ performances were graded on a nightly basis. Over time, not only did umpires’ strike zones move down to the knees, they went to the hollow and even a smidge below.
“I don’t think the Playing Rules Committee at the time of the last change ever expected that the umpires would call strikes at the hollow of the knee,” said Mets general manager Sandy Alderson, the current chairman of the committee. “To their credit, the umpires now are.”
So we just got through Memorial Day Weekend – two months into the current Major League Baseball season. Besides the fact that many of the major market teams are not playing anything resembling Major League quality (Mets, Red Sox, Cubs), fans are still trying to digest the pros and cons of instant replay rules.
MLB’s new, expanded replay rules went into effect at the beginning of the season, after several years of debate on whether they would improve questionable calls made on the field. The baseball purists considered it blasphemous. The younger generations raised on electronic gadgets were wondering what was taking the League so long.
Now with fans, and officials alike able to view any questionable call from dozens of camera angles, how many times have you seen it used as intended, to correct a terrible call? we’ve already seen one aspect of the new rules overturned – the infamous “ball transfer” call. Could others be far behind?
We’ve seen replays where everyone on the planet agreed a call should and would be overturned, only to see the umps rule otherwise. It seems managers are more than willing to halt a game for micro-examinations of the closest of close calls, all with the hopes of getting that edge, or a call reversed.
The overwhelming application of this replay rule — and the same happened and still does with the NFL’s version — is it quickly and predictably has not met either its need or demand. And that’s not likely to change, not unless common sense suddenly becomes common.
Of course, as seen for over 25 years during NFL telecasts and now in MLB telecasts, “conclusive evidence” on close plays often is more a matter of opinion than fact. Like a verdict being vacated on appeal, one judge’s conclusive evidence is another’s reasonable doubt.
Are these new rules really helping the umps getting the call right? Are most of them review-worthy at all? It’s hard to tell whether managers go to replay not so much to get the call right, as to see if another set of eyes may view a replay the same way said manager WANTS to see it – correct or not.
The typical Major League game clocks in at over 2.5 hours, not factoring in instant replay challenges. Does expanding the length of the game to MAYBE get a questionable call right really give what the League and its fans want? As the old adage goes, be careful what you wish for. You just might get it.
2013 Baseball Rules Changes Will be Going into Effect
It’s that time of year when our friends at the NFHS provides baseball umps with a rule change (or 3). Your friends at Smitteez like to share these with you, and get your take on them. They are:
1-3-2 NOTE: Clarifies and places additional emphasis on the importance and legal repercussions of altering non-wood baseball bats.
3-3-1f: Restricts the use of any video monitoring or replay equipment for coaching purposes during the course of the game.
3-3-1i: Restricts the use of any electronic devices in the coach’s box.
6-2-2c Exception: Clarifies that an incoming pitcher be treated equally. If a pitcher is ejected, an incoming pitcher should be afforded the same warm-up criteria as if he were replacing an injured player.
So what do you think of these – good, bad or indifferent? Let’s hear some chatter!